Untitled Document
COMPARATIVE TEST RESULT/MEASUREMENT
BETWEEN SILICA GEL AND E-SORB MD



1. Bags of 50g each of Silica Gel and E-sorb MD were used in the test.

2. Test in Climate Chamber
  • One bag each of Silica Gel and TE-sorb MD were placed in a climate chamber
        and weighed once each 24th
  • The temperature and the relative humidity were measured from time to time
        and were found to be within
  • Temperature = +/-10%
    Relative Humidity = +/-5%

  • For the first part of the test the Relative Humidity was maintained at 80%.
  • After 9 days, when both the samples had saturated the
        Relative Humidity was increased to 95%.
  • The bag of Silica Gel was inadvertedly destroyed in an
        attempt to dry it after 9 days.


  • 3. Test under Realistic Temperature Cycle
  • A metal container was placed outside.
  • Outside temperature varied between 0 and 15ï‚°C.
  • The Temperature and Relative Humidity was logged with a data logger.
  • Inside the container daily cycles occurred of:


  • Temperature = 0-35ï‚°C
    Relative Humidity = 40-100%

  • One bag each of Silica Gel and E-sorb MD were placed inside and
        weighed once every 12 hours.


  • 4. Result in Brief

  • Under RH = 80% and T = 20ï‚°C
                Silica Gel absorbs 20% of its weight

  •     E-sorb MD absorbs 40% of its weight
  • Under RH = 95% and T = 20ï‚°C

  •             E-sorb MD absorbs more than
        50% of its weight
  • Under temperature cycling conditions
                Silica Gel absorbs about    22%
                E-sorb MD absorbs about 35%
  • The Silica Gel show a clear "saw tooth" pattern of
        absorption/re-evaporation over the temperature cycle.
  • The E-sorb MD does not show such a pattern.